PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-70.63%
Negative net income growth while ON stands at 13.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-1.29%
Negative yoy D&A while ON is 11.73%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-12.20%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ON stands at 180.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.03%
Negative yoy working capital usage while ON is 7.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.28%
Negative yoy inventory while ON is 33.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.79%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ON at -139.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
102.19%
Some yoy increase while ON is negative at -43.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-34.43%
Negative yoy CFO while ON is 10.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
26.20%
Lower CapEx growth vs. ON's 54.27%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
56.46%
Purchases growth of 56.46% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
30.23%
Liquidation growth of 30.23% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -875.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-34.55%
We reduce yoy invests while ON stands at 14.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
We repay more while ON is negative at -1093.48%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-35.04%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -97.52%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-63.45%
We cut yoy buybacks while ON is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.