205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-84.11%
Negative net income growth while ON stands at 93.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-18.09%
Negative yoy D&A while ON is 3.12%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
113.04%
Some yoy growth while ON is negative at -89.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-114.20%
Negative yoy working capital usage while ON is 52.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.50%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. ON's 471.43%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-108.16%
Negative yoy usage while ON is 57.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-23.53%
Both negative yoy, with ON at -96.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-77.55%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with ON at -64.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
44.16%
Some CapEx rise while ON is negative at -13.20%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.97%
Purchases growth of 83.97% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
287.30%
Liquidation growth of 287.30% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
128.52%
We have mild expansions while ON is negative at -984.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.00%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. ON's 108.20%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
73.83%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x ON's 33.33%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.