PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-10.57%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with ON at -268.54%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
113.04%
Well above ON's 116.13% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
75.47%
SBC growth while ON is negative at -42.86%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
173.20%
Less working capital growth vs. ON's 5500.00%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
121.57%
AR growth while ON is negative at -7.32%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
126.19%
Inventory growth well above ON's 123.81%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
260.95%
Growth well above ON's 83.77%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-105.88%
Negative yoy while ON is 153.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
80.35%
Some CFO growth while ON is negative at -12.35%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
30.07%
CapEx growth of 30.07% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.13%
Purchases growth of 5.13% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
199.82%
Liquidation growth of 199.82% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-762.87%
We reduce yoy invests while ON stands at 1.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
65.68%
We repay more while ON is negative at -11.55%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-81.67%
Negative yoy issuance while ON is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
0.44%
Buyback growth below 50% of ON's 368.89%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.