205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.78%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with ON at -29.54%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
1.32%
Some D&A expansion while ON is negative at -4.75%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
121.43%
Well above ON's 134.94% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
41.67%
SBC growth well above ON's 6.34%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-274.09%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ON at -281.78%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-140.96%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ON at -221.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-394.44%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ON at -81.01%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-232.20%
Both negative yoy AP, with ON at -34.29%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-996.77%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ON at -129.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
80.84%
Well above ON's 53.01%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-42.68%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with ON at -9.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-15.45%
Negative yoy CapEx while ON is 0.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while ON stands at 88.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
43.17%
Purchases growth of 43.17% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
46.41%
Liquidation growth of 46.41% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
126.27%
Growth well above ON's 122.22%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
138.98%
Investing outflow well above ON's 7.86%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
75.00%
We repay more while ON is negative at -4334.31%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
1441.67%
We slightly raise equity while ON is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-15.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -1215.79%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.