205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
10.15%
Net income growth under 50% of ON's 103.88%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
2.49%
Some D&A expansion while ON is negative at -0.20%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-112.50%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ON stands at 343.10%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
13.11%
Less SBC growth vs. ON's 30.49%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
67.77%
Less working capital growth vs. ON's 281.79%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
95.88%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. ON's 243.43%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-38.46%
Negative yoy inventory while ON is 72.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-124.64%
Negative yoy AP while ON is 159.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
52.00%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. ON's 630.14%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-2750.00%
Both negative yoy, with ON at -96.49%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
14.65%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of ON's 123.34%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-25.32%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -38.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.83%
Purchases growth of 29.83% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
22.75%
Liquidation growth of 22.75% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-1878.95%
We reduce yoy other investing while ON is 3100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
111.45%
We have mild expansions while ON is negative at -30.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
We repay more while ON is negative at -588.25%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-72.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -13.64%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-46.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while ON is 87.72%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.