PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
194.16%
Net income growth above 1.5x QCOM's 15.52%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-79.10%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 214.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-54.39%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QCOM at -353.04%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-316.67%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 78.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-361.54%
Negative yoy purchasing while QCOM stands at 38.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
57.14%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x QCOM's 19.68%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
97.46%
We have some outflow growth while QCOM is negative at -7369.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
37.31%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. QCOM's 159.36%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
241.67%
We slightly raise equity while QCOM is negative at -83.05%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.