PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
15.24%
Net income growth under 50% of QCOM's 583.28%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.10%
Both negative yoy, with QCOM at -7.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-24.69%
Negative yoy CFO while QCOM is 229.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
33.50%
Some CapEx rise while QCOM is negative at -6.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-165.74%
Negative yoy purchasing while QCOM stands at 72.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
2.20%
We have some liquidation growth while QCOM is negative at -10.79%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
76.36%
We have some outflow growth while QCOM is negative at -1655.95%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-34.85%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -826.85%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
169.44%
Stock issuance far above QCOM's 140.85%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-22.86%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.