205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
43.35%
Some net income increase while QCOM is negative at -187.82%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.25%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 16220.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
42.40%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of QCOM's 216.84%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-0.40%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 48.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-57.29%
Negative yoy purchasing while QCOM stands at 46.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-47.33%
Both yoy lines are negative, with QCOM at -22.52%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-337.54%
We reduce yoy invests while QCOM stands at 30.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.68%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. QCOM's 1128.75%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
16.57%
Buyback growth of 16.57% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.