205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
200.23%
Net income growth above 1.5x QCOM's 12.76%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
244.49%
Well above QCOM's 97.79% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-3480.00%
AR is negative yoy while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
98.50%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -1712.44%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
716.67%
Growth well above QCOM's 117.69%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-526.36%
Both negative yoy, with QCOM at -622.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
59.20%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of QCOM's 212.33%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
13.73%
Some CapEx rise while QCOM is negative at -102.28%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-70.77%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -336.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
75.53%
Below 50% of QCOM's 987.82%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
91.89%
Investing outflow well above QCOM's 159.12%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.02%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 70.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
50.00%
Buyback growth of 50.00% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.