205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-65.26%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QCOM at -357.84%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
700.00%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. QCOM's 2697.06%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-81.83%
Negative yoy CFO while QCOM is 7.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
7.50%
Some CapEx rise while QCOM is negative at -39.31%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.22%
Purchases well above QCOM's 18.79%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-30.35%
We reduce yoy sales while QCOM is 35.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -480.27%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
17.76%
Investing outflow well above QCOM's 27.15%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.65%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 42.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
68.18%
Buyback growth of 68.18% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.