205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
40.10%
Some net income increase while QCOM is negative at -197.89%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.62%
Some D&A expansion while QCOM is negative at -0.03%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-57.14%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
199.59%
Slight usage while QCOM is negative at -120.06%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.63%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -100.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
272.97%
Some yoy usage while QCOM is negative at -122.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-841.00%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 16717.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-43.00%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QCOM at -95.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
8.77%
Some CapEx rise while QCOM is negative at -549.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.91%
Some yoy expansion while QCOM is negative at -26.39%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-27.75%
Both yoy lines are negative, with QCOM at -36.59%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-129.65%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -229.83%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-46.67%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 60.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-0.66%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.