PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.16%
Net income growth under 50% of QCOM's 41.79%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
4.09%
Some D&A expansion while QCOM is negative at -34.91%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
600.00%
Deferred tax of 600.00% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.53%
Negative yoy working capital usage while QCOM is 169.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
100.00%
AR growth well above QCOM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
16.46%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -167.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-100.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with QCOM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-2988.89%
Negative yoy usage while QCOM is 1914.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.75%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of QCOM's 71.04%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
11.22%
CapEx growth well above QCOM's 15.74%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-14.43%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -21.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
13.68%
Below 50% of QCOM's 46.04%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -66.44%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
7.96%
Investing outflow well above QCOM's 2.69%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
64.29%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. QCOM's 228.13%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
34.30%
Buyback growth of 34.30% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.