PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
52.55%
Net income growth above 1.5x QCOM's 3.70%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-0.55%
Negative yoy D&A while QCOM is 6.67%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-370.27%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.87%
Less working capital growth vs. QCOM's 178.78%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
100.00%
AR growth well above QCOM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
1333.33%
Inventory growth well above QCOM's 50.00%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while QCOM is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
67.36%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. QCOM's 257.14%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
1125.00%
Some yoy increase while QCOM is negative at -81.20%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
58.13%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of QCOM's 106.80%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
7.22%
Lower CapEx growth vs. QCOM's 50.00%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.02%
Some yoy expansion while QCOM is negative at -20.86%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-1.00%
We reduce yoy sales while QCOM is 43.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-130.95%
We reduce yoy other investing while QCOM is 700.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
348.32%
Investing outflow well above QCOM's 106.84%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
103.51%
Stock issuance far above QCOM's 4.17%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
13.46%
Buyback growth of 13.46% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.