205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.64%
Net income growth under 50% of QCOM's 5.26%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
4.72%
D&A growth well above QCOM's 6.25%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
163.22%
Deferred tax of 163.22% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
840.00%
Slight usage while QCOM is negative at -166.21%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.33%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -2900.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
375.64%
Some yoy usage while QCOM is negative at -152.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
179.59%
Well above QCOM's 159.09%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
83.07%
Some CFO growth while QCOM is negative at -36.30%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-75.10%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -65.96%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-726.77%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -1.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-0.50%
We reduce yoy sales while QCOM is 2.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
100.00%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. QCOM's 3066.67%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-304.19%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -97.44%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.93%
We slightly raise equity while QCOM is negative at -31.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
61.61%
Buyback growth of 61.61% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.