PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-70.63%
Negative net income growth while QCOM stands at 8.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-1.29%
Negative yoy D&A while QCOM is 9.52%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-12.20%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.03%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -132.62%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.28%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.79%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -109.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
102.19%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. QCOM's 258.70%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-34.43%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QCOM at -8.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
26.20%
Some CapEx rise while QCOM is negative at -13.04%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
56.46%
Some yoy expansion while QCOM is negative at -43.51%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
30.23%
At 50-75% of QCOM's 52.12%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage if competitor monetizes investments more efficiently.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while QCOM is 236.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-34.55%
We reduce yoy invests while QCOM stands at 59.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-35.04%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -45.99%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-63.45%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.