205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-22.75%
Negative net income growth while QCOM stands at 5.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
1.39%
Less D&A growth vs. QCOM's 10.98%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
96.10%
Well above QCOM's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-318.88%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -182.69%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.15%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -910.00%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-314.61%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -69.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
91.48%
Some yoy increase while QCOM is negative at -51.56%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-34.44%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QCOM at -17.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
16.36%
Some CapEx rise while QCOM is negative at -149.61%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.62%
Purchases well above QCOM's 42.78%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-33.09%
Both yoy lines are negative, with QCOM at -20.57%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-85.71%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -100.60%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-251.72%
We reduce yoy invests while QCOM stands at 453.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
201.96%
Stock issuance far above QCOM's 21.25%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
24.16%
Buyback growth below 50% of QCOM's 71.34%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.