PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
27.21%
Net income growth above 1.5x QCOM's 10.07%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
0.68%
Less D&A growth vs. QCOM's 6.45%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
1300.00%
Deferred tax of 1300.00% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
579.12%
Slight usage while QCOM is negative at -430.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-126.67%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -188.24%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
718.42%
Some yoy usage while QCOM is negative at -40.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-114.77%
Both negative yoy, with QCOM at -23.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
70.49%
Some CFO growth while QCOM is negative at -0.30%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
12.64%
Some CapEx rise while QCOM is negative at -70.65%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.03%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -22.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-10.17%
We reduce yoy sales while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
3150.00%
We have some outflow growth while QCOM is negative at -12466.67%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-410.24%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -670.53%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-55.61%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 38.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-89.89%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -220.00%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.