205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.32%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QCOM at -32.24%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
32.80%
D&A growth well above QCOM's 8.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-1950.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 75.50%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-176.67%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -236.67%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-600.00%
Negative yoy inventory while QCOM is 45.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-101.01%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -162.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-99.31%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 187.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-54.95%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QCOM at -15.63%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-20.99%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 48.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while QCOM is negative at -940.91%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
54.39%
Purchases well above QCOM's 34.50%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-52.92%
We reduce yoy sales while QCOM is 42.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.19%
We reduce yoy invests while QCOM stands at 145.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.43%
We slightly raise equity while QCOM is negative at -22.22%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
53.46%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x QCOM's 26.11%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.