PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.58%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QCOM at -2.22%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
1.96%
Less D&A growth vs. QCOM's 5.41%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-1014.29%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
167.37%
Slight usage while QCOM is negative at -528.57%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
204.11%
Inventory growth well above QCOM's 92.05%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
158.55%
Some yoy usage while QCOM is negative at -381.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
980.00%
Some yoy increase while QCOM is negative at -48.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
102.70%
Some CFO growth while QCOM is negative at -21.86%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
27.04%
Some CapEx rise while QCOM is negative at -84.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.03%
We reduce yoy sales while QCOM is 4.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
100.00%
Growth well above QCOM's 105.63%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
34.25%
We have mild expansions while QCOM is negative at -546.36%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.29%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 191.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
0.92%
Buyback growth below 50% of QCOM's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.