PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-80.96%
Negative net income growth while QCOM stands at 17.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
12.69%
D&A growth well above QCOM's 2.56%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
70.51%
Deferred tax of 70.51% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
171.65%
Slight usage while QCOM is negative at -116.48%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
163.16%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. QCOM's 1457.14%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
175.28%
Growth well above QCOM's 242.01%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-5.56%
Both negative yoy, with QCOM at -28.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
6.27%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of QCOM's 33.92%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
60.91%
CapEx growth well above QCOM's 25.41%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-46066.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -58.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
133.33%
We have some liquidation growth while QCOM is negative at -26.81%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-969.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -133.81%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.00%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 4.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
10.02%
Buyback growth of 10.02% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.