205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-84.11%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QCOM at -61.16%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-18.09%
Negative yoy D&A while QCOM is 26.67%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
113.04%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. QCOM's 231.03%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-114.20%
Negative yoy working capital usage while QCOM is 743.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.50%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -31.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-108.16%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -157.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-23.53%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 302.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-77.55%
Negative yoy CFO while QCOM is 253.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
44.16%
CapEx growth well above QCOM's 43.48%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.97%
Purchases well above QCOM's 17.70%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
287.30%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x QCOM's 20.33%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
128.52%
Investing outflow well above QCOM's 51.75%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.00%
We slightly raise equity while QCOM is negative at -94.63%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
73.83%
Buyback growth of 73.83% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.