PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
106.92%
Net income growth under 50% of QCOM's 355.02%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.72%
Negative yoy D&A while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
1083.33%
Deferred tax of 1083.33% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-2.13%
Negative yoy SBC while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-68.42%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -98.47%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-60.34%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QCOM at -223.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-243.24%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -37.50%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.00%
Some yoy usage while QCOM is negative at -96.86%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-160.00%
Both negative yoy, with QCOM at -56.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
49.73%
Some CFO growth while QCOM is negative at -13.94%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-370.83%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 36.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above QCOM's 73.08%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-154.05%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -29.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-73.59%
Both yoy lines are negative, with QCOM at -2.16%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-769.01%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -58.18%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.95%
Stock issuance far above QCOM's 133.33%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-0.40%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.