PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.75%
Net income growth above 1.5x QCOM's 8.82%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-2.62%
Negative yoy D&A while QCOM is 13.64%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-7.04%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-6.52%
Negative yoy SBC while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
56.25%
Less working capital growth vs. QCOM's 3553.33%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
183.87%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. QCOM's 394.74%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-62.26%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -346.67%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-140.58%
Negative yoy usage while QCOM is 617.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
255.56%
Some yoy increase while QCOM is negative at -517.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
20.02%
Operating cash flow growth similar to QCOM's 21.53%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
-92.92%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 3.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.01%
Some yoy expansion while QCOM is negative at -78.71%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
300.00%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x QCOM's 41.72%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.47%
We have mild expansions while QCOM is negative at -105.93%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.76%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. QCOM's 109.14%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-40.24%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.