205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
16.87%
Some net income increase while QCOM is negative at -7.97%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.79%
D&A growth well above QCOM's 3.09%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
36.36%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. QCOM's 100.00%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
4.26%
SBC growth while QCOM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-129.33%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -198.61%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
25.10%
AR growth while QCOM is negative at -159.77%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
1.35%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -148.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-233.33%
Negative yoy AP while QCOM is 164.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-97.81%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -202.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.85%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QCOM at -36.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-29.22%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -22.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -13.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
43.04%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x QCOM's 11.48%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
500.00%
We have mild expansions while QCOM is negative at -48.26%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.81%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.