PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.90%
Some net income increase while QCOM is negative at -15.04%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.16%
Negative yoy D&A while QCOM is 115.92%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-248.39%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 104.61%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-7.02%
Negative yoy SBC while QCOM is 15.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
37.95%
Slight usage while QCOM is negative at -52.63%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-131.82%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QCOM at -169.74%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
46.84%
Inventory growth well above QCOM's 20.00%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
100.00%
AP growth well above QCOM's 138.03%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
42.93%
Some yoy usage while QCOM is negative at -78.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.29%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of QCOM's 3583.33%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-42.27%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 22.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.30%
Some yoy expansion while QCOM is negative at -53.14%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-51.33%
Both yoy lines are negative, with QCOM at -18.62%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-963.49%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -312.82%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.57%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 55.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
41.37%
Buyback growth of 41.37% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.