PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-10.57%
Negative net income growth while QCOM stands at 3.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
113.04%
Some yoy growth while QCOM is negative at -73.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
75.47%
SBC growth while QCOM is negative at -3.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
173.20%
Slight usage while QCOM is negative at -266.67%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
121.57%
AR growth well above QCOM's 96.23%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
126.19%
Inventory growth well above QCOM's 205.56%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
260.95%
Some yoy usage while QCOM is negative at -254.32%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-105.88%
Both negative yoy, with QCOM at -170.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
80.35%
Some CFO growth while QCOM is negative at -28.51%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
30.07%
Some CapEx rise while QCOM is negative at -177.22%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.13%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. QCOM's 31.39%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
199.82%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x QCOM's 57.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-762.87%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -64.38%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
65.68%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of QCOM's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
-81.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -70.15%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
0.44%
Buyback growth of 0.44% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.