PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.07%
Negative net income growth while QCOM stands at 33.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-0.90%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with QCOM at -13.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
96.36%
Some yoy growth while QCOM is negative at -98.24%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
4.55%
SBC growth while QCOM is negative at -3.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-149.76%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -122.15%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-73.31%
AR is negative yoy while QCOM is 76.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-144.83%
Negative yoy inventory while QCOM is 363.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
54.88%
A yoy AP increase while QCOM is negative at -84.24%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-323.08%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -132.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
100.00%
Well above QCOM's 98.36%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-53.76%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QCOM at -2.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
32.68%
Some CapEx rise while QCOM is negative at -86.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-1660.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -415.79%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
79.61%
Purchases well above QCOM's 0.22%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
60.84%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x QCOM's 32.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
127.08%
We have mild expansions while QCOM is negative at -7.37%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-50.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while QCOM is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
103.94%
We slightly raise equity while QCOM is negative at -10.59%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.