PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
37.12%
Net income growth at 50-75% of QCOM's 50.67%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
-1.26%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with QCOM at -6.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
120.83%
Well above QCOM's 25.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
17.19%
SBC growth of 17.19% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-153.88%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -20.87%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-129.40%
AR is negative yoy while QCOM is 10.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-37.36%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -24.12%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-209.91%
Negative yoy AP while QCOM is 116.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-292.59%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -145.56%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
99.15%
Some yoy increase while QCOM is negative at -7.97%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-66.82%
Negative yoy CFO while QCOM is 40.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
12.50%
CapEx growth well above QCOM's 18.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.91%
Purchases well above QCOM's 21.65%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
9.86%
We have some liquidation growth while QCOM is negative at -44.42%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
111.64%
We have mild expansions while QCOM is negative at -61250.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
241.35%
We slightly raise equity while QCOM is negative at -4.49%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-13.17%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 70.27%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.