PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-18.76%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QCOM at -4.88%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-1.67%
Negative yoy D&A while QCOM is 7.06%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
73.33%
Some yoy growth while QCOM is negative at -18.64%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-7.04%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QCOM at -2.49%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
242.42%
Less working capital growth vs. QCOM's 516.00%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
1160.00%
AR growth while QCOM is negative at -1019.05%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
16.67%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. QCOM's 262.86%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
176.47%
A yoy AP increase while QCOM is negative at -231.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-91.45%
Negative yoy usage while QCOM is 908.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-390.91%
Both negative yoy, with QCOM at -465.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
4.17%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of QCOM's 20.85%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
13.71%
CapEx growth well above QCOM's 23.57%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-13.71%
Negative yoy acquisition while QCOM stands at 72.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
5.81%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. QCOM's 54.88%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
0.15%
Below 50% of QCOM's 100.42%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
35.54%
We have some outflow growth while QCOM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
41.98%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. QCOM's 290.37%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-51.86%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 158.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.