PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.70%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QCOM at -19.45%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
5.08%
Some D&A expansion while QCOM is negative at -0.37%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-171.15%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 437.50%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
18.18%
SBC growth well above QCOM's 2.92%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-214.16%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -2.88%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-146.86%
AR is negative yoy while QCOM is 435.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
440.00%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -40.60%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-1000.00%
Negative yoy AP while QCOM is 49.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-1161.54%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -157.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
117.19%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. QCOM's 340.57%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-61.47%
Negative yoy CFO while QCOM is 10.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
28.04%
CapEx growth well above QCOM's 12.50%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -2323.08%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-43.97%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -13.92%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
14.60%
We have some liquidation growth while QCOM is negative at -58.92%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
148.72%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. QCOM's 21825.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-147.97%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -89.91%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.45%
We slightly raise equity while QCOM is negative at -21.39%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
1.91%
Buyback growth below 50% of QCOM's 69.83%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.