PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.94%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 14.19%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
0.33%
Less D&A growth vs. QCOM's 1.04%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
52.63%
Some yoy growth while QCOM is negative at -340.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-19.48%
Negative yoy SBC while QCOM is 9.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
165.88%
Well above QCOM's 114.40% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
125.45%
AR growth well above QCOM's 115.72%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
76.67%
Inventory growth well above QCOM's 55.95%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
18.64%
Lower AP growth vs. QCOM's 56.28%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
18200.00%
Some yoy usage while QCOM is negative at -210.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
130.00%
Well above QCOM's 8.25%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
78.45%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x QCOM's 47.35%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-28.75%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 73.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
28.75%
Some acquisitions while QCOM is negative at -212.50%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-69.64%
Negative yoy purchasing while QCOM stands at 44.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-68.16%
We reduce yoy sales while QCOM is 7.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-18.18%
We reduce yoy other investing while QCOM is 310.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-147.76%
We reduce yoy invests while QCOM stands at 131.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-45.60%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -62.11%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
9.83%
We have some buyback growth while QCOM is negative at -34.73%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.