PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.12%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QCOM at -15.33%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-0.97%
Negative yoy D&A while QCOM is 1.71%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
185.19%
Well above QCOM's 325.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-3.23%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QCOM at -7.66%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
49.40%
Slight usage while QCOM is negative at -1065.28%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
430.95%
AR growth while QCOM is negative at -333.09%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-371.43%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -632.43%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
162.50%
AP growth well above QCOM's 4.20%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-82.87%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -25.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-517.39%
Both negative yoy, with QCOM at -3.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-8.03%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QCOM at -39.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-21.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -45.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
21.36%
Some acquisitions while QCOM is negative at -336.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-33.10%
Negative yoy purchasing while QCOM stands at 7.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
15.29%
We have some liquidation growth while QCOM is negative at -17.15%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
68.13%
We have some outflow growth while QCOM is negative at -90.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-28.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -109.60%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
105.88%
Stock issuance far above QCOM's 50.52%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-4.18%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 11.48%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.