PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.76%
Some net income increase while QCOM is negative at -10.40%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-8.42%
Negative yoy D&A while QCOM is 9.76%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
202.00%
Some yoy growth while QCOM is negative at -230.23%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-12.12%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QCOM at -14.02%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
51.38%
Well above QCOM's 9.60% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
776.60%
AR growth well above QCOM's 12.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-29.82%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -23.49%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
104.17%
AP growth well above QCOM's 46.74%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-85.61%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -62.82%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-1175.00%
Both negative yoy, with QCOM at -149.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
1.49%
Some CFO growth while QCOM is negative at -20.42%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-17.99%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 51.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
17.99%
Some acquisitions while QCOM is negative at -1968.46%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-129.63%
Negative yoy purchasing while QCOM stands at 48.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-55.41%
We reduce yoy sales while QCOM is 7.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
56.06%
We have some outflow growth while QCOM is negative at -9.90%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-273.52%
We reduce yoy invests while QCOM stands at 11.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-33.33%
We cut debt repayment yoy while QCOM is 30.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
214.29%
Stock issuance far above QCOM's 40.26%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
20.63%
Buyback growth below 50% of QCOM's 58.74%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.