PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-14.95%
Negative net income growth while QCOM stands at 41.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-4.60%
Negative yoy D&A while QCOM is 11.66%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-52.94%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 8.04%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
24.14%
SBC growth well above QCOM's 6.01%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-206.15%
Negative yoy working capital usage while QCOM is 413.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-131.45%
AR is negative yoy while QCOM is 476.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-242.50%
Negative yoy inventory while QCOM is 35.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-5300.00%
Negative yoy AP while QCOM is 135.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-479.49%
Negative yoy usage while QCOM is 337.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
129.30%
Some yoy increase while QCOM is negative at -847.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-54.34%
Negative yoy CFO while QCOM is 62.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
24.39%
CapEx growth well above QCOM's 28.49%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while QCOM stands at 83.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
81.02%
Some yoy expansion while QCOM is negative at -61.38%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
105.95%
We have some liquidation growth while QCOM is negative at -10.41%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
94.83%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. QCOM's 245.05%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
184.89%
Investing outflow well above QCOM's 47.04%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x QCOM's 14.11%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-38.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -54.17%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-0.48%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 8.07%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.