PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.26%
Net income growth similar to QCOM's 23.97%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
-2.07%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with QCOM at -4.30%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-111.86%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 45.35%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-26.32%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QCOM at -4.45%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
4400.00%
Well above QCOM's 89.85% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-28.95%
AR is negative yoy while QCOM is 45.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
195.77%
Inventory growth well above QCOM's 142.45%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-76.92%
Negative yoy AP while QCOM is 44.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
155.26%
Growth well above QCOM's 80.42%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-72.00%
Both negative yoy, with QCOM at -130.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
32.18%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of QCOM's 149.66%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
12.03%
Some CapEx rise while QCOM is negative at -8.80%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-12.03%
Negative yoy acquisition while QCOM stands at 76.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
1.51%
Some yoy expansion while QCOM is negative at -27.52%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-57.44%
We reduce yoy sales while QCOM is 26.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
7.89%
We have some outflow growth while QCOM is negative at -29.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-1027.69%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -10.43%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
We repay more while QCOM is negative at -9.39%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-20.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -12.21%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
5.12%
Buyback growth below 50% of QCOM's 93.54%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.