PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.92%
Net income growth at 50-75% of QCOM's 9.99%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
-2.17%
Negative yoy D&A while QCOM is 3.95%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-700.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
10.29%
SBC growth well above QCOM's 2.93%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
17.19%
Slight usage while QCOM is negative at -266.54%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-94.12%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QCOM at -1490.84%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-96.23%
Negative yoy inventory while QCOM is 130.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
115.38%
A yoy AP increase while QCOM is negative at -125.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
38.49%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. QCOM's 156.79%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
131.25%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. QCOM's 263.64%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
15.35%
Some CFO growth while QCOM is negative at -40.90%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-18.90%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 5.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.27%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -13.80%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
12.95%
We have some liquidation growth while QCOM is negative at -9.23%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-561.29%
We reduce yoy other investing while QCOM is 97.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-103.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -88.40%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-50.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while QCOM is 21.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-47.83%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 21.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-18.18%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 36.26%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.