PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
297.09%
Some net income increase while QCOM is negative at -3643.45%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
2.23%
Some D&A expansion while QCOM is negative at -8.56%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-119.50%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 8402.99%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
55.56%
SBC growth well above QCOM's 21.57%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-141.72%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -14.38%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-158.86%
AR is negative yoy while QCOM is 800.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-97.96%
Negative yoy inventory while QCOM is 1000.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-172.86%
Both negative yoy AP, with QCOM at -149.80%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-118.17%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -27.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-282.14%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 458.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-42.35%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QCOM at -27.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
18.18%
CapEx growth well above QCOM's 13.74%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while QCOM stands at 14.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
31.31%
Some yoy expansion while QCOM is negative at -58.15%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
84.18%
We have some liquidation growth while QCOM is negative at -88.13%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
98.32%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. QCOM's 200.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
129.62%
We have mild expansions while QCOM is negative at -117.34%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x QCOM's 32.85%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
9.88%
We slightly raise equity while QCOM is negative at -19.28%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-23.65%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 28.57%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.