PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.78%
Negative net income growth while QCOM stands at 316.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.61%
Some D&A expansion while QCOM is negative at -10.86%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
117.39%
Some yoy growth while QCOM is negative at -40.76%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
45.24%
SBC growth well above QCOM's 2.68%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-174.23%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -105.71%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-161.64%
AR is negative yoy while QCOM is 57.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
185.15%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -119.57%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-415.38%
Both negative yoy AP, with QCOM at -299.50%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-169.12%
Negative yoy usage while QCOM is 16.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
19.05%
Some yoy increase while QCOM is negative at -45.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-48.39%
Negative yoy CFO while QCOM is 181.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
22.29%
CapEx growth well above QCOM's 4.40%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while QCOM stands at 58.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
55.26%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. QCOM's 145.54%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-26.77%
Both yoy lines are negative, with QCOM at -60.81%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
96.62%
We have some outflow growth while QCOM is negative at -102.39%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-22.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -108.61%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-48.60%
We cut debt repayment yoy while QCOM is 77.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
297.37%
We slightly raise equity while QCOM is negative at -87.04%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
42.66%
Buyback growth below 50% of QCOM's 95.18%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.