PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.20%
Net income growth under 50% of QCOM's 224.13%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
3.00%
D&A growth well above QCOM's 2.32%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-112.90%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 1172.54%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-28.36%
Negative yoy SBC while QCOM is 10.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
24.31%
Slight usage while QCOM is negative at -1190.74%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
266.67%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. QCOM's 681.86%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-25.00%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -48.39%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
211.54%
A yoy AP increase while QCOM is negative at -140.87%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-40.30%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -4657.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
141.82%
Some yoy increase while QCOM is negative at -251.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
10.91%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of QCOM's 518.26%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
47.54%
Some CapEx rise while QCOM is negative at -45.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-47.54%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -8.06%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-312.55%
Negative yoy purchasing while QCOM stands at 45.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
10.00%
We have some liquidation growth while QCOM is negative at -47.95%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
32.42%
We have some outflow growth while QCOM is negative at -49.17%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-254.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -90.83%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.88%
We slightly raise equity while QCOM is negative at -41.61%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
47.16%
Buyback growth of 47.16% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.