PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-24.91%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QCOM at -76.45%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-9.09%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with QCOM at -0.85%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
1350.00%
Some yoy growth while QCOM is negative at -107.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-14.58%
Negative yoy SBC while QCOM is 37.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
62.22%
Less working capital growth vs. QCOM's 145.77%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
248.05%
AR growth while QCOM is negative at -106.24%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-200.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with QCOM at -87.23%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
8.75%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. QCOM's 111.34%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-195.65%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 81.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-11.95%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QCOM at -75.01%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-9.40%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -27.82%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
9.40%
Acquisition growth of 9.40% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-109.94%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -189.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
38.64%
Liquidation growth of 38.64% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-5.41%
We reduce yoy other investing while QCOM is 228.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-110.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -62.02%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.26%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 72.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-7.24%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -921.74%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.