PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.76%
Net income growth under 50% of QCOM's 250.30%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.80%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with QCOM at -6.61%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
56.86%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. QCOM's 237.61%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-16.00%
Negative yoy SBC while QCOM is 5.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
238.74%
Slight usage while QCOM is negative at -375.21%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
89.81%
AR growth while QCOM is negative at -275.02%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
82.81%
Inventory growth well above QCOM's 65.83%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
123.08%
Lower AP growth vs. QCOM's 1720.00%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
742.31%
Growth well above QCOM's 65.71%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-384.38%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 81.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
47.26%
Some CFO growth while QCOM is negative at -7.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-45.21%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 16.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
45.21%
Acquisition spending well above QCOM's 16.13%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
7.44%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. QCOM's 61.40%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
211.18%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x QCOM's 89.40%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-45.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -139.19%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
54.50%
Investing outflow well above QCOM's 89.29%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.32%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 7550.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.