PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.83%
Net income growth under 50% of QCOM's 15.10%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
2.43%
Less D&A growth vs. QCOM's 4.91%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
1300.00%
Well above QCOM's 57.29% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-27.54%
Negative yoy SBC while QCOM is 0.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
336.76%
Well above QCOM's 12.43% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-785.71%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QCOM at -50.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-132.50%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -268.03%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
305.88%
A yoy AP increase while QCOM is negative at -2.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
339.29%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. QCOM's 910.99%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
108.77%
Some yoy increase while QCOM is negative at -69.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
14.47%
Operating cash flow growth similar to QCOM's 15.87%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
-25.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -4.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
25.91%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. QCOM's 95.63%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
13.27%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. QCOM's 34.88%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-46.44%
Both yoy lines are negative, with QCOM at -17.63%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-34.57%
We reduce yoy other investing while QCOM is 611.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-796.06%
We reduce yoy invests while QCOM stands at 79.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.89%
We slightly raise equity while QCOM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
4.79%
Buyback growth below 50% of QCOM's 58.58%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.