PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.81%
Net income growth under 50% of QCOM's 37.97%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-15.81%
Negative yoy D&A while QCOM is 4.68%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-133.33%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 191.87%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-129.19%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -358.50%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
22.58%
AR growth while QCOM is negative at -258.88%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-261.54%
Negative yoy inventory while QCOM is 74.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-254.29%
Both negative yoy AP, with QCOM at -70.89%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-49.25%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -300.68%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
40.00%
Some yoy increase while QCOM is negative at -151.23%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-2.92%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QCOM at -68.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-163.79%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 15.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-86.01%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -93.75%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-118.37%
Negative yoy purchasing while QCOM stands at 64.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
105.93%
We have some liquidation growth while QCOM is negative at -17.33%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
94.86%
We have some outflow growth while QCOM is negative at -397.83%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-152.15%
We reduce yoy invests while QCOM stands at 113.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
63.21%
We repay more while QCOM is negative at -15.51%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-30.67%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-2.16%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -22.38%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.