PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.09%
Some net income increase while QCOM is negative at -13.68%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
12.15%
D&A growth well above QCOM's 5.42%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-1300.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
14.86%
SBC growth well above QCOM's 0.40%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-109.18%
Negative yoy working capital usage while QCOM is 66.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-320.21%
AR is negative yoy while QCOM is 89.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
7.33%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -9.56%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
72.73%
A yoy AP increase while QCOM is negative at -74.65%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-75.90%
Negative yoy usage while QCOM is 88.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-517.86%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 339.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-17.54%
Negative yoy CFO while QCOM is 31.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-34.76%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 15.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-50.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while QCOM stands at 78.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
38.29%
Purchases well above QCOM's 18.96%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
51.41%
We have some liquidation growth while QCOM is negative at -64.60%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
730.77%
We have some outflow growth while QCOM is negative at -97.88%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
173.44%
We have mild expansions while QCOM is negative at -369.64%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.75%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-100.68%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 19.27%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.