PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-14.51%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QCOM at -21.64%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
0.38%
Less D&A growth vs. QCOM's 11.87%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-5666.67%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-8.82%
Negative yoy SBC while QCOM is 0.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-105.20%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -14.44%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-3.33%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QCOM at -749.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-72.20%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -8.33%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-19.05%
Negative yoy AP while QCOM is 383.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-11.29%
Negative yoy usage while QCOM is 94.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-117.24%
Both negative yoy, with QCOM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-26.17%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QCOM at -50.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-22.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -14.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.14%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. QCOM's 56.46%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
20.34%
Below 50% of QCOM's 57.41%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-120.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -126.83%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
51.40%
Investing outflow well above QCOM's 94.05%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
214.96%
We repay more while QCOM is negative at -853.27%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-35.90%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 16700.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
14.86%
Buyback growth of 14.86% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.