PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.75%
Negative net income growth while QCOM stands at 1.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
6.67%
D&A growth well above QCOM's 1.91%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-90.38%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 59.88%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-28.83%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QCOM at -2.23%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
98.82%
Well above QCOM's 140.90% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
74.68%
AR growth while QCOM is negative at -158.15%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
59.41%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. QCOM's 155.00%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-63.51%
Negative yoy AP while QCOM is 127.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
359.38%
Growth well above QCOM's 114.59%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
61.63%
Some yoy increase while QCOM is negative at -456.70%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
38.46%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of QCOM's 82.36%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-3.39%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 32.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.89%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. QCOM's 1630.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-5.87%
We reduce yoy sales while QCOM is 125.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-111.90%
We reduce yoy other investing while QCOM is 57550.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
28.97%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. QCOM's 875.45%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
100.00%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 88.03%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
4.62%
We slightly raise equity while QCOM is negative at -99.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
41.77%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of QCOM's 55.70%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.