PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.77%
Negative net income growth while QCOM stands at 72.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
7.42%
Some D&A expansion while QCOM is negative at -5.41%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
49.29%
Some yoy growth while QCOM is negative at -133.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
55.88%
SBC growth while QCOM is negative at -0.99%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-227.14%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -88.89%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-38.62%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QCOM at -148.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
7.69%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -17.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-670.00%
Negative yoy AP while QCOM is 40.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-261.98%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -112.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-1650.00%
Both negative yoy, with QCOM at -163.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-47.14%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QCOM at -27.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-8.71%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 26.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
6500.00%
Acquisition spending well above QCOM's 53.13%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-89.63%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -124.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-22.87%
We reduce yoy sales while QCOM is 1.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-566.67%
We reduce yoy other investing while QCOM is 240.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-970.42%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -103.24%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-57.09%
We cut debt repayment yoy while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
44.44%
We slightly raise equity while QCOM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
95.38%
We have some buyback growth while QCOM is negative at -96.00%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.