205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-282.98%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QRVO at -18.40%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
1.19%
Some D&A expansion while QRVO is negative at -4.69%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
205.00%
Well above QRVO's 82.51% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
703.03%
Slight usage while QRVO is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1200.00%
Some inventory rise while QRVO is negative at -67.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
653.33%
Growth well above QRVO's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
298.89%
Some yoy increase while QRVO is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
31.68%
Some CFO growth while QRVO is negative at -8.15%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
12.27%
Some CapEx rise while QRVO is negative at -31.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.97%
Negative yoy purchasing while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-72.07%
We reduce yoy sales while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2470.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -134.85%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
126.09%
We slightly raise equity while QRVO is negative at -13.26%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-414.29%
We cut yoy buybacks while QRVO is 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.