205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.71%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QRVO at -18.40%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-6.51%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with QRVO at -4.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-67.39%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QRVO stands at 82.51%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
124.78%
Slight usage while QRVO is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
134.62%
Some inventory rise while QRVO is negative at -67.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
121.14%
Growth well above QRVO's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-617.65%
Both negative yoy, with QRVO at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
101.67%
Some CFO growth while QRVO is negative at -8.15%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
22.46%
Some CapEx rise while QRVO is negative at -31.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.40%
Purchases growth of 4.40% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-41.55%
We reduce yoy sales while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -134.85%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -13.26%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
33.33%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x QRVO's 0.15%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.