205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.03%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QRVO at -18.40%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
1.59%
Some D&A expansion while QRVO is negative at -4.69%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
90.54%
Well above QRVO's 82.51% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.01%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QRVO at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-100.00%
AR is negative yoy while QRVO is 34.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
54.37%
Some inventory rise while QRVO is negative at -67.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-10033.33%
Negative yoy usage while QRVO is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
400.00%
Some yoy increase while QRVO is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-19.03%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QRVO at -8.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-23.29%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -31.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.18%
Purchases growth of 99.18% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-88.60%
We reduce yoy sales while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-146.29%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -134.85%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.11%
We slightly raise equity while QRVO is negative at -13.26%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
50.46%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x QRVO's 0.15%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.